Showing posts with label Corporatist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Corporatist. Show all posts

Monday, December 5, 2011

Fox Business' Follow The Money Unmasks The Muppets' Liberal Agenda: "Brainwashing" Your Kids! December 02, 2011 11:29 pm ET From the December 2 edition of Fox Business' Follow the Money:



 4646 196

Cenk Uygur has a message for corrupt politicians on both sides of the aisle: He’s coming for them.
Uygur, the outspoken former MSNBC host and internet commentator, debuts his new show, The Young Turks with Cenk Uygur on Current TV at 7 p.m. ET Monday. He’s the latest progressive pundit to join the Current family, and his show will be the lead-in to Countdown with Keith Olbermann.
“It’s not going to be your father’s cable news show,” Uygur told TPM last week. “Our show is going to be very aggressive. If you’re looking for a fun time, in terms of hardcore coverage of the issues, we’re going to be your show.”
So how does Uygur intend to set himself apart from Olbermann, who is literally the centerpiece of Current’s prime-time programming? The Young Turks will be “irreverent” and “free-flowing,” Uygur said, featuring a panel and some conservative guests. The show will be a “gathering place” for progressives, he added, but that doesn’t mean it will only appeal to the far left.
Uygur’s show, like Countdown and former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm’s The War Roomafter it, will focus primarily on commentary and analysis. Uygur said original reporting in his show is “a work in progress” that will hopefully come after the program gets off the ground. The big stories Uygur intends to focus on are campaign finance reform and broader financial reform.
“Money has corrupted our politics,” Uygur said. “Washington is nearly entirely corrupt. The American people cannot win on any issue. We’ve lost our representative democracy.”
Uygur has done quite well for himself as an independent voice online. Asked why he wanted to team up with a cable company again, he said, “the more platforms, the better.” Uygur will continue to host his online news program during the day.
“The Young Turks” will feature prominent progressive contributors, Uygur said, including Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC) co-founder Adam Green. On December 12, Jack Abramoff will be on the program.
To those turned off by traditional cable news shows, Uygur promises to be an alternative. “We’re not going to pull back,” he said. “Mainstream media, it’s a joke; come and watch a program that’s reality.”

Saturday, November 19, 2011

The 2012 Election And The Ten Most Powerful States


With just less than a year to go until the 2012 election and most states having wrapped up their once-a-decade redistricting process, we’re starting to get a good sense about where the key House battles will take place.
A combination of an unpopular Congress, a volatile electorate, and changes resulting from redistricting mean there could be dozens of competitive races in just a handful of states.
But which states?
Today we look at 10 states that could determine whether Democrats retake the House or the GOP holds its majority next year.
To the Line!
10. New Hampshire: This state isn’t on the Line because of anything having to do with redistricting since it only has two congressional seats. Recent history has shown the state to be a central national battleground, however. Both New Hampshire seats went Democratic in 2006 when the party won the majority and then flipped to Republican when the GOP retook the House in 2010. And both will remain competitive next year, no matter how they are drawn. If Democrats win one of them, they’ve had a good night. If they win both, they’ve probably reclaimed the House again.
9. Ohio/Pennsylvania (tie): These states are really pretty similar so we’re lumping them together. In both states, the GOP is drawing the lines, but the current delegation is so heavily Republican that it’s hard to both add new opportunities and shore up their current members. Both states feature about five Republicans in swing districts that need to be strengthened. If the GOP can hold most or all of those seats on Election Day, they have probably done enough to hold the House.
8. North Carolina: The GOP targeted four – count ‘em, four – Tarheel State Democrats in redistricting and has a good chance against each. Here’s how the hierarchy goes: Republicans should be able to take Rep. Brad Miller’s seat, barring a real disaster. They also have a great chance to take Rep. Larry Kissell out. If the GOP can also beat Democratic Reps. Heath Shuler and Mike McIntyre, they have probably held the House with ease.
7. Texas: Democrats got a huge break here when a Washington, D.C., court declined to pre-clear the Texas GOP’s aggressive redistricting map last week. The ensuing court battle means a San Antonio-based panel of judges will draw an interim map for 2012 – a map that is expected to move this from a state where the GOP would have gained three seats and Democrats one (the state is adding four new seats) to one where Democrats could gain four seats. Four seats would be huge for Democrats, given that they only need 25 nationally to retake the majority. At the same time, we have no idea what kind of map the judges will draw, and they may protect incumbents.
6. Colorado: A Denver judge last week picked a map that had been drafted by Democrats, which means this is a big opportunity for the party. Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Colo.) is newly imperiled, and freshman Rep. Scott Tipton (R-Colo.) got a tougher district as well. Beating Coffman would be a particularly good sign since Democrats are trying to make the 2010 election about the extremeness of GOP incumbents. Coffman is very conservative but he’s also a proven campaigner with three statewide wins under his belt. If he loses in a district that still has a slight conservative lean that bodes poorly for GOP freshmen without such a track record in sometimes tougher districts.
5. Arizona: Guess what? Another break for Democrats here, after the state Supreme Court on Thursdayreinstated the chairwoman of the state’s bipartisan redistricting commission. Gov. Jan Brewer (R) and the GOP-led state Senate had removed the chairwoman because they saw the map the commission drafted as favoring Democrats. And indeed, Democrats will have chances. The map makes the state’s new district a Democratic-leaning one, endangers freshman Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) and makes Rep.Gabrielle Giffords’ (D-Ariz.) district safer in case she can’t run for reelection. If Democrats can win all three of those seats, it’s going to go a long ways toward regaining the majority.
4. New York: Three people have complicated the Empire State’s redistricting process: Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) and special election winners Kathy Hochul (D) and Bob Turner (R). Cuomo has suggested he might veto a partisan-drawn map, which could throw many seats up for grabs. The wins by Hochul and Turner earlier this year, meanwhile, complicated the calculus for which two seats will be eliminated. (The state is losing two seats due to population growth that lagged the national average.) But at the very least, plenty of Upstate districts have changed hands in recent years and many of them will continue to be competitive regardless of how the map is drawn.
3. Illinois: Democrats really reshuffled the map here and could win three, four or even five new seats. Democrats should be able to take seats left behind by Reps. Joe Walsh (R) and Adam Kinzinger (R), who are running in primaries against other GOP incumbents. They should also be able to beat Rep. Bob Dold (R) in the new 10th district. Beyond that, if they beat Rep. Bobby Schilling (R) they’re having a good night, and if they beat Rep. Tim Johnson (R) they may be able to win the House.
2. California: The nation’s biggest state has been an electoral afterthought for some time, going a nearly a decade with only one congressional seat changing hands between 2002 and 2010. That won’t happen again. At least three GOP-held seats are likely to go Democratic in the newly reshuffled map crafted by the state’s new citizen’s redistricting commission. But Democrats think they can run up the score even more, while the GOP strategists believe they can win Democratic-held seats elsewhere to even the score. We could see the results spanning from a total wash to Democrats gaining eight seats. Anything on the top end of that scale would be a major Democratic win.
1. Florida: This remains the biggest question mark still left in redistricting: Just how potent are Florida’s new redistricting standards? The constitutional amendments passed by voters last year try to rein in partisan gerrymandering. Republicans insist they will still be able to add two GOP-leaning seats on top of their 19-to-6 advantage in the state’s delegation. But if the amendments have teeth, Democrats could gain back a handful of seats – as many as five or six, according to their estimates. That’s a big swing. Of course, it all depends on what the courts do and so far the courts have been pretty good to Democrats.

Van Jones Reveals Future Of Occupy Wall Street

VAN JONES REVEALS FUTURE OF OCCUPY WALL ST: ‘YOU HAVEN’T SEEN ANYTHING YET’


Van Jones said Occupy Wall Street is going to be recruiting 2,000 candidates to run for office for "phase two" of the movement. (AP File Photo)
Van Jones offered a prediction Wednesday for those who have been watching the Occupy Wall Street movement: “You haven’t seen anything yet.”
The former Obama administration “green jobs czar” — an ardent supporter of the Occupy movement since its inception — said in an interview with CNN that the movement is ready to evolve into the areas of politics and policy-making, much like the Tea Party did in 2010.
“You’re going to see an evolution now as you go from protests, keep the protests, but now expand into politics,” Jones said. “And if you thought there was an earthquake in 2010 when the Tea Party moved into politics, wait until this 99 percent movement moves over into politics. You haven’t seen anything yet.”
Jones said the movement is “going to be recruiting 2,000 candidates to run for office now under this 99 percent banner“ as Occupy Wall Street enters ”phase two.”
“Phase two, you move from anger to answers. You move from pointing out the problem to pointing out the solutions,” Jones said. “What you’re going to see now is you have the Occupy movement at the center, that’s the beating heart.”

Friday, October 21, 2011

Rebel Alliance Flash Targets Walmart Executives

By Stephen C. Webster
Friday, October 21, 2011
 
rebelallianceprotest-screen
 
A flash mob sporting signs from the “rebel alliance” of Star Wars fame surprised a group of Walmart executives last night when they showed up at a fundraiser in Washington, D.C.’s Union Square, banging drums and playing the film’s famous theme song.
Chanting “hey-hey, ho-ho, corporate greed has got to go,” the demonstration went on for about 30 minutes before protesters left. There were no arrests.
The protest was a joint action put on by an alliance between protesters at “Occupy D.C.” and the labor rights group “Respect D.C.,” a coalition of organizations that demand fair wages for working people.
On Respect D.C.’s website, they explain the motivation for staging the flash mob: “Wal-Mart is only required to pay the District’s minimum wage, currently $8.25 per hour. The company says it will pay competitive wages, but does not specify what competitive means. Many workers in suburban stores, even after several years with Wal-Mart, make less than the $12.50, the current living wage as defined by D.C. law. Low-wage jobs do not help workers, especially those with families, move out of poverty to become contributors to the District’s tax base and economy.”
The group has pushed Walmart to sign a community benefits agreement to pay workers a livable wage, and to take steps to mitigate the traffic and other environmental impacts around its stores.
“Wal-Mart can be a force to improve wages and benefits for workers in the District,” they explain. “According to the Center for Labor Research and Education at the University of California Berkeley, if Wal-Mart were to increase workers’ pay to $12 an hour, and pass 100 percent of the wage increase on to consumers, the average impact on a Wal-Mart shopper would be $0.46 per shopping trip, or $12.49 per year.”
This video was published to YouTube on Thursday, Oct. 20, 2011.
Stephen C. Webster
Stephen C. Webster
Stephen C. Webster is the senior editor of Raw Story, and is based out of Austin, Texas. He previously worked as the associate editor of The Lone Star Iconoclast in Crawford, Texas, where he covered state politics and the peace movement’s resurgence at the start of the Iraq war. Webster has also contributed to publications such as True/Slant, Austin Monthly, The Dallas Business Journal, The Dallas Morning News, Fort Worth Weekly, The News Connection and others. Follow him on Twitter at @StephenCWebster.
Share this story >>
 
 
TAKE ACTION
 
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.
 

Add New Comment

  • Image

Showing 0 comments